https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187581 The court dismissed the application challenging the confiscation of goods seized by customs authorities, emphasizing the timely service of notice to show cause for confiscated goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The judge ruled that service through registered post within six months, even if returned undelivered, constitutes effective service under the Act. Therefore, the order of confiscation was upheld, underscoring the significance of statutory compliance in serving notices under the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Sun, 08 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:12:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187581 The court dismissed the application challenging the confiscation of goods seized by customs authorities, emphasizing the timely service of notice to show cause for confiscated goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The judge ruled that service through registered post within six months, even if returned undelivered, constitutes effective service under the Act. Therefore, the order of confiscation was upheld, underscoring the significance of statutory compliance in serving notices under the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Sun, 08 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187581