<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 979 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187578</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the case with the delay condoned, referencing a prior decision of the Bombay High Court. Justices S.H. Kapadia and Aftab Alam presided over the matter, with representation for the petitioner by Mr. V. Shekhar, Mr. Kul Bharat, and Mr. B.V. Balaram Das.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 979 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187578</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the case with the delay condoned, referencing a prior decision of the Bombay High Court. Justices S.H. Kapadia and Aftab Alam presided over the matter, with representation for the petitioner by Mr. V. Shekhar, Mr. Kul Bharat, and Mr. B.V. Balaram Das.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>