<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 934 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It was found that the assessee had complied with the conditions specified under Section 271AAA(2), and the Assessing Officer&#039;s penalty order lacked specific reasons and specificity. The Tribunal emphasized that substantial compliance with declaring and paying tax sufficed for immunity from penalty, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the assessee&#039;s compliance with the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 934 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. It was found that the assessee had complied with the conditions specified under Section 271AAA(2), and the Assessing Officer&#039;s penalty order lacked specific reasons and specificity. The Tribunal emphasized that substantial compliance with declaring and paying tax sufficed for immunity from penalty, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the assessee&#039;s compliance with the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>