<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333882</link>
    <description>In a sunset review of anti-dumping duty, injury may be assessed on a country-wise cumulative basis by considering total imports from the exporting country, rather than segregating individual exporters or excluding allegedly undumped imports, where no material prejudice is shown. Disclosure obligations are satisfied when the essential facts underlying the determination are shared with interested parties; post-disclosure correction of exporter-specific data and disclosure of consolidated DGCI figures for undercutting and underselling analysis did not require a fresh exchange of confidential transaction-wise material. The continuation of anti-dumping duty after expiry of the earlier notification was not disturbed because the review had been initiated before expiry and the challenge to extension was only incidental.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333882</link>
      <description>In a sunset review of anti-dumping duty, injury may be assessed on a country-wise cumulative basis by considering total imports from the exporting country, rather than segregating individual exporters or excluding allegedly undumped imports, where no material prejudice is shown. Disclosure obligations are satisfied when the essential facts underlying the determination are shared with interested parties; post-disclosure correction of exporter-specific data and disclosure of consolidated DGCI figures for undercutting and underselling analysis did not require a fresh exchange of confidential transaction-wise material. The continuation of anti-dumping duty after expiry of the earlier notification was not disturbed because the review had been initiated before expiry and the challenge to extension was only incidental.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>