<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 531 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187561</link>
    <description>An ex parte reassessment cannot be sustained unless the hearing notice is duly served in the manner required by law. The assessee&#039;s affidavit denying tender or refusal of the notice remained uncontroverted, and there was no reliable material to disbelieve it. The Court held that the First Appellate Authority should not have rejected the service objection, especially because the Assessing Authority did not send notice by registered post to the firm&#039;s recorded address before proceeding ex parte. The reassessment was therefore vitiated for breach of natural justice, and the assessment orders were quashed with a direction for fresh reassessment after proper notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 531 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187561</link>
      <description>An ex parte reassessment cannot be sustained unless the hearing notice is duly served in the manner required by law. The assessee&#039;s affidavit denying tender or refusal of the notice remained uncontroverted, and there was no reliable material to disbelieve it. The Court held that the First Appellate Authority should not have rejected the service objection, especially because the Assessing Authority did not send notice by registered post to the firm&#039;s recorded address before proceeding ex parte. The reassessment was therefore vitiated for breach of natural justice, and the assessment orders were quashed with a direction for fresh reassessment after proper notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>