<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5518</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court determined that the land in question, despite some agricultural activities, did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from capital gains tax due to its location in a commercial area and intended use for construction or sale. The decision emphasized the importance of considering various factors, including past and intended future agricultural use, in determining the classification of land for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5518</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court determined that the land in question, despite some agricultural activities, did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from capital gains tax due to its location in a commercial area and intended use for construction or sale. The decision emphasized the importance of considering various factors, including past and intended future agricultural use, in determining the classification of land for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>