https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187558 A company law petition under Sections 397 and 398 was treated as referable to arbitration because the substantive grievances arose from a sponsorship agreement containing an arbitration clause. The disputes concerned alleged breaches of that agreement, including failure to amend articles, appoint a nominee director, furnish information, and issues linked to alleged siphoning of funds. As the reliefs sought depended on deciding those contractual disputes, Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 required reference to arbitration and prevented the Company Law Board from proceeding with the petition. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:36:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187558 A company law petition under Sections 397 and 398 was treated as referable to arbitration because the substantive grievances arose from a sponsorship agreement containing an arbitration clause. The disputes concerned alleged breaches of that agreement, including failure to amend articles, appoint a nominee director, furnish information, and issues linked to alleged siphoning of funds. As the reliefs sought depended on deciding those contractual disputes, Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 required reference to arbitration and prevented the Company Law Board from proceeding with the petition. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187558