<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 573 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187555</link>
    <description>The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 were treated as operating in distinct legislative fields: the 1949 Act governed municipal administration, while the 1961 Act governed the orderly establishment and organisation of industries in industrial estates and areas. Any overlap in civic amenities was held to be ancillary and incidental to those primary objects. Because the industrial area had not been withdrawn from municipal jurisdiction under Section 56 of the 1961 Act, the 1961 Act continued to apply, but that did not create a direct conflict with the municipal notification issued under the 1949 Act. No inter se conflict was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 573 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187555</link>
      <description>The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 were treated as operating in distinct legislative fields: the 1949 Act governed municipal administration, while the 1961 Act governed the orderly establishment and organisation of industries in industrial estates and areas. Any overlap in civic amenities was held to be ancillary and incidental to those primary objects. Because the industrial area had not been withdrawn from municipal jurisdiction under Section 56 of the 1961 Act, the 1961 Act continued to apply, but that did not create a direct conflict with the municipal notification issued under the 1949 Act. No inter se conflict was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>