https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187551 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars a criminal court from reviewing or altering a signed final order, except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. An application framed as a clarification request cannot be used to obtain substantive reconsideration of an earlier final order, including a declaration that it does not bind a party or affect possession. The saving of inherent power under Section 482 does not override this express statutory prohibition, and the exception in Section 362 operates only where some other provision of the Code or other law expressly permits alteration or review. The High Court therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:21:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187551 Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars a criminal court from reviewing or altering a signed final order, except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. An application framed as a clarification request cannot be used to obtain substantive reconsideration of an earlier final order, including a declaration that it does not bind a party or affect possession. The saving of inherent power under Section 482 does not override this express statutory prohibition, and the exception in Section 362 operates only where some other provision of the Code or other law expressly permits alteration or review. The High Court therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187551