<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5511</link>
    <description>Compensation received for requisition of agricultural land remained agricultural income where the land continued to be cultivated and retained its agricultural character. The payment was directly referable to land used for agricultural purposes and was treated as rent or revenue derived from such land under section 2(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It was distinguishable from cases where requisitioned property was not put to agricultural use. The compensation was therefore exempt from tax as agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5511</link>
      <description>Compensation received for requisition of agricultural land remained agricultural income where the land continued to be cultivated and retained its agricultural character. The payment was directly referable to land used for agricultural purposes and was treated as rent or revenue derived from such land under section 2(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. It was distinguishable from cases where requisitioned property was not put to agricultural use. The compensation was therefore exempt from tax as agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>