<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 881 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the disclosed income was accepted without discrepancies and the notice under Section 148 was issued within the permissible time frame. Therefore, the penalty of Rs. 2,50,000/- was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 881 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the disclosed income was accepted without discrepancies and the notice under Section 148 was issued within the permissible time frame. Therefore, the penalty of Rs. 2,50,000/- was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>