<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 876 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration on whether the activities fell under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), re-determination of taxable value after expense deductions, and consideration of cum-tax benefit as per the Commissioner&#039;s order. The Tribunal held that reimbursements received by the appellants needed to be deducted from the gross value of taxable service. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a denovo consideration of the points related to the nature of activities, deduction of reimbursable expenses, and the cum-tax benefit as per the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 876 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration on whether the activities fell under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), re-determination of taxable value after expense deductions, and consideration of cum-tax benefit as per the Commissioner&#039;s order. The Tribunal held that reimbursements received by the appellants needed to be deducted from the gross value of taxable service. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for a denovo consideration of the points related to the nature of activities, deduction of reimbursable expenses, and the cum-tax benefit as per the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>