https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333852 Writ jurisdiction was held available despite an appellate remedy where the adjudicating authority failed to supply relied-upon documents and denied a meaningful opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The Court also held that clandestine removal of M.S. ingots cannot be established on electricity-consumption data alone; such figures are only corroborative and must be supported by concrete evidence of raw material, production, packing, labour, stock discrepancy, transport, and sale proceeds. Because the essential materials were missing and the defence was not properly heard, the adjudication was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh decision. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333852 Writ jurisdiction was held available despite an appellate remedy where the adjudicating authority failed to supply relied-upon documents and denied a meaningful opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The Court also held that clandestine removal of M.S. ingots cannot be established on electricity-consumption data alone; such figures are only corroborative and must be supported by concrete evidence of raw material, production, packing, labour, stock discrepancy, transport, and sale proceeds. Because the essential materials were missing and the defence was not properly heard, the adjudication was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333852