<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333842</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for a Writ of Mandamus to release goods under a specific Bill of Entry. The goods, initially classified as &quot;Bird Scare Device,&quot; faced disagreement on classification due to concerns over noise pollution and regulations under the Arms Act and Environment Protection Act. After confiscation and an appeal, the Commissioner of Customs overturned the confiscation order, directing further testing by the Forensic Science Department to accurately determine if the goods fell under &quot;Arms and Ammunition.&quot; The Department agreed to conduct the examination with the petitioner&#039;s cooperation, with a decision expected within three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333842</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for a Writ of Mandamus to release goods under a specific Bill of Entry. The goods, initially classified as &quot;Bird Scare Device,&quot; faced disagreement on classification due to concerns over noise pollution and regulations under the Arms Act and Environment Protection Act. After confiscation and an appeal, the Commissioner of Customs overturned the confiscation order, directing further testing by the Forensic Science Department to accurately determine if the goods fell under &quot;Arms and Ammunition.&quot; The Department agreed to conduct the examination with the petitioner&#039;s cooperation, with a decision expected within three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>