<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 858 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333838</link>
    <description>Where adjudication relies on witness statements, denial of a requested cross-examination can breach natural justice and undermine the resulting penalty findings. The affected party must be given a reasonable opportunity to test the statements used against it before adverse conclusions are sustained. If that opportunity is withheld, the matter requires reconsideration after cross-examination is allowed and the party is able to participate fully in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 858 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333838</link>
      <description>Where adjudication relies on witness statements, denial of a requested cross-examination can breach natural justice and undermine the resulting penalty findings. The affected party must be given a reasonable opportunity to test the statements used against it before adverse conclusions are sustained. If that opportunity is withheld, the matter requires reconsideration after cross-examination is allowed and the party is able to participate fully in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>