<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 857 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333837</link>
    <description>Processing of castor oil was analysed against the test of manufacture under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act: manufacture requires a transformation into a commercially different article with a distinct identity, character or use, and mere refining or processing is insufficient if the commodity retains its essential identity. On that reasoning, the castor oil process was not treated as manufacture. For export treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, the goods exported after processing were accepted as the same goods purchased from the dealer because they had not become a commercially different commodity; the sale to the exporter was therefore treated as preceding export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 857 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333837</link>
      <description>Processing of castor oil was analysed against the test of manufacture under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act: manufacture requires a transformation into a commercially different article with a distinct identity, character or use, and mere refining or processing is insufficient if the commodity retains its essential identity. On that reasoning, the castor oil process was not treated as manufacture. For export treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, the goods exported after processing were accepted as the same goods purchased from the dealer because they had not become a commercially different commodity; the sale to the exporter was therefore treated as preceding export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>