<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 844 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the addition of cash deposits in bank accounts, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to make additions judiciously. The dismissal of the appeal by CIT(A) for lack of interest in prosecution was upheld. No specific direction was given concerning the disallowance of LIC premium paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 844 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the addition of cash deposits in bank accounts, emphasizing the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to make additions judiciously. The dismissal of the appeal by CIT(A) for lack of interest in prosecution was upheld. No specific direction was given concerning the disallowance of LIC premium paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>