<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333820</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as no exempt income was earned by the assessee. The tribunal emphasized that section 14A cannot be invoked in the absence of exempt income, following the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. It was held that the claimed expenditure was genuine and necessary for business activities, dismissing the disallowance and upholding the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333820</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as no exempt income was earned by the assessee. The tribunal emphasized that section 14A cannot be invoked in the absence of exempt income, following the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. It was held that the claimed expenditure was genuine and necessary for business activities, dismissing the disallowance and upholding the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>