<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions disputed by the Department, including the deletion of an addition of Rs. 10,00,000 under section 68 of the Act for unexplained share application money, Rs. 13,89,056 on account of interest on ICD, and Rs. 32,94,678 on account of a static creditor. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for thorough document examination by the Assessing Officer and the burden of proof to disallow legitimate business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions disputed by the Department, including the deletion of an addition of Rs. 10,00,000 under section 68 of the Act for unexplained share application money, Rs. 13,89,056 on account of interest on ICD, and Rs. 32,94,678 on account of a static creditor. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for thorough document examination by the Assessing Officer and the burden of proof to disallow legitimate business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>