<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5500</link>
    <description>In income-tax reference proceedings, the High Court may test perversity only on the evidence and statement of case before the Tribunal, and cannot rely on extra-record material; the proper course for additional facts is a supplemental statement of case. The Court also required proof of a valid assessment through a signed assessment order or equivalent signed determination. As no signed assessment order or signed assessment form for 1955-56 was shown, the earlier assessment was not established and the later assessments in the Hindu undivided family status failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5500</link>
      <description>In income-tax reference proceedings, the High Court may test perversity only on the evidence and statement of case before the Tribunal, and cannot rely on extra-record material; the proper course for additional facts is a supplemental statement of case. The Court also required proof of a valid assessment through a signed assessment order or equivalent signed determination. As no signed assessment order or signed assessment form for 1955-56 was shown, the earlier assessment was not established and the later assessments in the Hindu undivided family status failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>