https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333815 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a tax show cause notice was held not maintainable where the objections depended on disputed questions of fact, including alleged suppression, invocation of the extended limitation period, and the effect of prior departmental correspondence. The court stated that interference at the notice stage is justified only if the notice is without jurisdiction, issued by an incompetent authority, or patently contrary to law. As the issues required factual adjudication by the statutory authority, the petitioner was relegated to the remedies under the taxing statute and the notice was not interdicted at the threshold. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333815 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a tax show cause notice was held not maintainable where the objections depended on disputed questions of fact, including alleged suppression, invocation of the extended limitation period, and the effect of prior departmental correspondence. The court stated that interference at the notice stage is justified only if the notice is without jurisdiction, issued by an incompetent authority, or patently contrary to law. As the issues required factual adjudication by the statutory authority, the petitioner was relegated to the remedies under the taxing statute and the notice was not interdicted at the threshold. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333815