<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (8) TMI 87 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187511</link>
    <description>Reassessment of escaped turnover under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was treated as valid where no returns were filed and notice was issued within the six-year limitation period, because non-filing could still result in escaped assessment. The accompanying penalty was treated as ancillary to the reassessment power, so the same limitation period applied unless the statute clearly provided otherwise. Penalty proceedings were therefore time-barred for the assessment year beyond six years, but remained valid for the year still within time. The writ petition succeeded only to the extent of deleting the time-barred penalty, while the reassessment and balance penalty demand were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (8) TMI 87 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187511</link>
      <description>Reassessment of escaped turnover under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was treated as valid where no returns were filed and notice was issued within the six-year limitation period, because non-filing could still result in escaped assessment. The accompanying penalty was treated as ancillary to the reassessment power, so the same limitation period applied unless the statute clearly provided otherwise. Penalty proceedings were therefore time-barred for the assessment year beyond six years, but remained valid for the year still within time. The writ petition succeeded only to the extent of deleting the time-barred penalty, while the reassessment and balance penalty demand were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>