<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (1) TMI 37 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187509</link>
    <description>A tax appeal subject to a proviso requiring payment of tax was treated as maintainable where the tax due under the operative or modified demand had been paid before disposal, even if it was unpaid on the date of presentation. The proviso was read as a condition precedent linked to the tax then due for payment, while the limitation provision governed presentation time. The Court also treated the Commissioner&#039;s instalment order as modifying the original demand and held that any objection not raised before the appellate authority did not later defeat an appeal decided on merits. The appellate order was therefore valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (1) TMI 37 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187509</link>
      <description>A tax appeal subject to a proviso requiring payment of tax was treated as maintainable where the tax due under the operative or modified demand had been paid before disposal, even if it was unpaid on the date of presentation. The proviso was read as a condition precedent linked to the tax then due for payment, while the limitation provision governed presentation time. The Court also treated the Commissioner&#039;s instalment order as modifying the original demand and held that any objection not raised before the appellate authority did not later defeat an appeal decided on merits. The appellate order was therefore valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>