<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (9) TMI 28 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187508</link>
    <description>An appeal against a penalty order under the Income-tax Act was treated as maintainable where the tax had been paid before the appeal was taken up for admission, even though payment had not been made on the date of presentation. The statutory phrase that no appeal shall lie unless tax has been paid was read as governing maintainability at the admission stage, not as fixing the date of filing, because the Act distinguished between presentation and admission. A recital in the prescribed appeal form could not override the statutory condition. The objection to competence therefore failed, and the appeal was regarded as properly entertainable once payment was completed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (9) TMI 28 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187508</link>
      <description>An appeal against a penalty order under the Income-tax Act was treated as maintainable where the tax had been paid before the appeal was taken up for admission, even though payment had not been made on the date of presentation. The statutory phrase that no appeal shall lie unless tax has been paid was read as governing maintainability at the admission stage, not as fixing the date of filing, because the Act distinguished between presentation and admission. A recital in the prescribed appeal form could not override the statutory condition. The objection to competence therefore failed, and the appeal was regarded as properly entertainable once payment was completed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>