<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 827 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333807</link>
    <description>Where an assessee used common inputs in the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted final products, the dispute concerned reversal or payment linked to exempted clearances under the excise credit framework. The Court noted that the assessee&#039;s arrangement had later been accepted by the Revenue in connected proceedings, and the earlier orders relied on also supported that position. In those circumstances, the substantial questions of law on which the appeal had been admitted no longer survived for adjudication, and the questions were answered against the Revenue. The appeal consequently failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 827 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333807</link>
      <description>Where an assessee used common inputs in the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted final products, the dispute concerned reversal or payment linked to exempted clearances under the excise credit framework. The Court noted that the assessee&#039;s arrangement had later been accepted by the Revenue in connected proceedings, and the earlier orders relied on also supported that position. In those circumstances, the substantial questions of law on which the appeal had been admitted no longer survived for adjudication, and the questions were answered against the Revenue. The appeal consequently failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>