<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 818 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333798</link>
    <description>An appeal may be dismissed for default if the appellant is absent, but it cannot be decided on merits behind the appellant&#039;s back. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal on merits in the appellant&#039;s absence was therefore impermissible, and the recall order could not be sustained. The order was set aside and the matter was directed to be heard afresh by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 818 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333798</link>
      <description>An appeal may be dismissed for default if the appellant is absent, but it cannot be decided on merits behind the appellant&#039;s back. The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal on merits in the appellant&#039;s absence was therefore impermissible, and the recall order could not be sustained. The order was set aside and the matter was directed to be heard afresh by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>