<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 401 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187499</link>
    <description>A valid notice to quit issued by a predecessor landlord continues to enure to the benefit of a successor when the property vests by operation of law, because the transfer carries accrued rights and the prior termination remains effective. Promissory estoppel does not apply where the alleged assurance is conditional, unauthorised, and beyond the subordinate officer&#039;s power to bind the public authority. On those principles, the tenancy termination and ejectment were upheld, and the challenge failed on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:53:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 401 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187499</link>
      <description>A valid notice to quit issued by a predecessor landlord continues to enure to the benefit of a successor when the property vests by operation of law, because the transfer carries accrued rights and the prior termination remains effective. Promissory estoppel does not apply where the alleged assurance is conditional, unauthorised, and beyond the subordinate officer&#039;s power to bind the public authority. On those principles, the tenancy termination and ejectment were upheld, and the challenge failed on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>