<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (11) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187498</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme treated regular payment of rent as an independent ground for eviction, distinct from the landlord&#039;s separate remedy for arrears. In assessing whether the tenant failed to pay rent regularly without sufficient cause, conduct both before and after the commencement of the relevant protective provision could be considered where it formed part of the statutory test. Repeated non-payment over several years, together with the absence of a bona fide attempt to use the statutory protection for arrears proceedings, supported liability to eviction. Payment made in the arrears proceedings did not remove the separate eviction ground based on irregular payment without sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (11) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187498</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme treated regular payment of rent as an independent ground for eviction, distinct from the landlord&#039;s separate remedy for arrears. In assessing whether the tenant failed to pay rent regularly without sufficient cause, conduct both before and after the commencement of the relevant protective provision could be considered where it formed part of the statutory test. Repeated non-payment over several years, together with the absence of a bona fide attempt to use the statutory protection for arrears proceedings, supported liability to eviction. Payment made in the arrears proceedings did not remove the separate eviction ground based on irregular payment without sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>