<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 395 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187491</link>
    <description>A life interest followed by a gift over to the testator&#039;s legal heirs vested the remainder in the son on the testator&#039;s death under section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as the exception in section 111 and section 120 did not apply. A 1955 settlement recognising the wife&#039;s maintenance and residence rights in the first floor matured into absolute ownership under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, but only for that portion and not the entire house. The plea of limitation and adverse possession failed because the adverse possession case was not clearly pleaded or established and the suit was otherwise within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 395 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187491</link>
      <description>A life interest followed by a gift over to the testator&#039;s legal heirs vested the remainder in the son on the testator&#039;s death under section 119 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as the exception in section 111 and section 120 did not apply. A 1955 settlement recognising the wife&#039;s maintenance and residence rights in the first floor matured into absolute ownership under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, but only for that portion and not the entire house. The plea of limitation and adverse possession failed because the adverse possession case was not clearly pleaded or established and the suit was otherwise within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>