<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187481</link>
    <description>A notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was held time-barred because it was issued after four years despite the assessee&#039;s full and complete disclosure. The Tribunal found that the reopening was beyond the limitation period and that the record supported complete disclosure, so the reassessment could not proceed. The High Court found no basis to disturb that conclusion, and the reassessment proceedings were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:55:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187481</link>
      <description>A notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was held time-barred because it was issued after four years despite the assessee&#039;s full and complete disclosure. The Tribunal found that the reopening was beyond the limitation period and that the record supported complete disclosure, so the reassessment could not proceed. The High Court found no basis to disturb that conclusion, and the reassessment proceedings were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>