<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 600 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187476</link>
    <description>A rectification application was allowed where the earlier order had omitted adjudication of ground no. 3 concerning deletion of an ad hoc disallowance from housekeeping charges. The order was recalled only to that extent, and the omitted ground was remanded for hearing and fresh adjudication. No finding was recorded on the substantive merits of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 600 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187476</link>
      <description>A rectification application was allowed where the earlier order had omitted adjudication of ground no. 3 concerning deletion of an ad hoc disallowance from housekeeping charges. The order was recalled only to that extent, and the omitted ground was remanded for hearing and fresh adjudication. No finding was recorded on the substantive merits of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>