<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO for a re-examination of the evidence regarding the Rs. 25,00,000/- expense claimed by the assessee for dismantling and transporting a crane. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies and lack of conclusive evidence but directed a fair hearing for the assessee to present necessary proof, emphasizing the need for a thorough review to determine the genuine nature of the expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO for a re-examination of the evidence regarding the Rs. 25,00,000/- expense claimed by the assessee for dismantling and transporting a crane. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies and lack of conclusive evidence but directed a fair hearing for the assessee to present necessary proof, emphasizing the need for a thorough review to determine the genuine nature of the expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>