<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5487</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that where a person is a partner in a partnership firm as the karta of an HUF, the income of his wife or minor children cannot be included in his individual income or the income of the HUF. The court endorsed the majority view that the term &quot;individual&quot; in section 64 does not include the karta of an HUF. The judgment clarified that clauses (i) and (ii) of section 64(1) are not applicable in such cases, directing the authorities to pass orders accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5487</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that where a person is a partner in a partnership firm as the karta of an HUF, the income of his wife or minor children cannot be included in his individual income or the income of the HUF. The court endorsed the majority view that the term &quot;individual&quot; in section 64 does not include the karta of an HUF. The judgment clarified that clauses (i) and (ii) of section 64(1) are not applicable in such cases, directing the authorities to pass orders accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>