<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5486</link>
    <description>Relief under section 84 attached from the assessment year relevant to the year in which the industrial undertaking first began commercial manufacture or production. Because the first thirty hooker cells were installed and used in the previous year ended 31 March 1957, commencement was treated as having occurred in 1957-58, not 1958-59, and no relief was available on the later-year basis. The undertaking was a single commercial unit, so later completion of additional cells did not justify partial or fractional relief. Profits for the relief had to be computed after deducting development rebate, leaving no entitlement on the resulting figures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5486</link>
      <description>Relief under section 84 attached from the assessment year relevant to the year in which the industrial undertaking first began commercial manufacture or production. Because the first thirty hooker cells were installed and used in the previous year ended 31 March 1957, commencement was treated as having occurred in 1957-58, not 1958-59, and no relief was available on the later-year basis. The undertaking was a single commercial unit, so later completion of additional cells did not justify partial or fractional relief. Profits for the relief had to be computed after deducting development rebate, leaving no entitlement on the resulting figures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>