<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 791 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333771</link>
    <description>The appellant, a manufacturer, was granted Cenvat Credit for Outdoor Catering Service and Employees Accident Insurance Service under Rule 2(k) (i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The decision was based on precedents establishing that such services are eligible for credit as input services, aligning with previous judgments on similar matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 791 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333771</link>
      <description>The appellant, a manufacturer, was granted Cenvat Credit for Outdoor Catering Service and Employees Accident Insurance Service under Rule 2(k) (i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The decision was based on precedents establishing that such services are eligible for credit as input services, aligning with previous judgments on similar matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>