<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333768</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal refused to admit the appeal under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 due to the duty amount involved being below the prescribed threshold of Rs. 2 lakhs. The decision was based solely on the statutory limit, without considering the merits of the case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specified criteria for appeal admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333768</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal refused to admit the appeal under the Second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 due to the duty amount involved being below the prescribed threshold of Rs. 2 lakhs. The decision was based solely on the statutory limit, without considering the merits of the case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specified criteria for appeal admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>