<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 785 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333765</link>
    <description>Books of account under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 cannot be rejected unless the assessing authority forms a positive view, on material, that the disclosed turnover is not worthy of credence. A minor survey discrepancy, without evidence of suppression, concealment, or withheld records, is insufficient to justify best judgment assessment. Where the explanation for the discrepancy is not disproved and the turnover estimate lacks empirical, contemporaneous, or otherwise fair and intelligible support, the assessment becomes arbitrary. On these facts, rejection of the books and the best judgment assessment were unsustainable, and the consequential entry tax assessment also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 785 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333765</link>
      <description>Books of account under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 cannot be rejected unless the assessing authority forms a positive view, on material, that the disclosed turnover is not worthy of credence. A minor survey discrepancy, without evidence of suppression, concealment, or withheld records, is insufficient to justify best judgment assessment. Where the explanation for the discrepancy is not disproved and the turnover estimate lacks empirical, contemporaneous, or otherwise fair and intelligible support, the assessment becomes arbitrary. On these facts, rejection of the books and the best judgment assessment were unsustainable, and the consequential entry tax assessment also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>