<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 778 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333758</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, confirming that the assessment orders were validly passed and tendered for service on 15.3.2016. It ruled that the application for settlement under section 245C was not maintainable after the assessment orders were passed, even before they were served, as per legal provisions and precedents. The stay granted was extended until 15.12.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 778 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333758</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, confirming that the assessment orders were validly passed and tendered for service on 15.3.2016. It ruled that the application for settlement under section 245C was not maintainable after the assessment orders were passed, even before they were served, as per legal provisions and precedents. The stay granted was extended until 15.12.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>