<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333751</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on transporting empty containers from yard to factory for stuffing export goods was treated as admissible under Notification No. 17/2009-Service Tax. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decisions in the same assessee&#039;s own case on identical facts, where the refund claim had already been accepted, and therefore the lower authorities&#039; rejection could not be sustained. The only amount separately disallowed for want of ARE-2s and shipping bills was accepted by the assessee as inconsequential. The refund claim was thus allowed in principle, subject only to the small residual disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 771 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333751</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on transporting empty containers from yard to factory for stuffing export goods was treated as admissible under Notification No. 17/2009-Service Tax. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decisions in the same assessee&#039;s own case on identical facts, where the refund claim had already been accepted, and therefore the lower authorities&#039; rejection could not be sustained. The only amount separately disallowed for want of ARE-2s and shipping bills was accepted by the assessee as inconsequential. The refund claim was thus allowed in principle, subject only to the small residual disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>