<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 769 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming a demand for service tax recovery, penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to verify and examine additional evidence introduced by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper examination of facts and legal provisions in reaching a just decision. The case involved contestation on limitation grounds and interpretation of relevant legal provisions, ultimately requiring a reevaluation based on all aspects presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 769 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming a demand for service tax recovery, penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Tribunal directed the original adjudicating authority to verify and examine additional evidence introduced by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of proper examination of facts and legal provisions in reaching a just decision. The case involved contestation on limitation grounds and interpretation of relevant legal provisions, ultimately requiring a reevaluation based on all aspects presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>