https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333748 A stay against implementation of the impugned order was sought in a matter concerning penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. CESTAT found no basis at that stage to grant stay against the order-in-appeal, so interim protection was declined. The Tribunal, however, directed that the matter be taken up for early final hearing, preserving the opportunity for prompt substantive consideration of the dispute. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333748 A stay against implementation of the impugned order was sought in a matter concerning penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. CESTAT found no basis at that stage to grant stay against the order-in-appeal, so interim protection was declined. The Tribunal, however, directed that the matter be taken up for early final hearing, preserving the opportunity for prompt substantive consideration of the dispute. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333748