<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 764 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333744</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a Central Excise Act prosecution after the Court weighed the seriousness of the allegations and the stage of investigation against the applicant&#039;s offer to deposit security, assurance of compliance, and the absence of immediate custodial necessity. The Court exercised bail discretion in favour of release, while imposing stringent conditions to safeguard the investigation and trial. The decision reflects that custody was not required once adequate protective terms were put in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 764 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333744</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a Central Excise Act prosecution after the Court weighed the seriousness of the allegations and the stage of investigation against the applicant&#039;s offer to deposit security, assurance of compliance, and the absence of immediate custodial necessity. The Court exercised bail discretion in favour of release, while imposing stringent conditions to safeguard the investigation and trial. The decision reflects that custody was not required once adequate protective terms were put in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>