https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333736 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Goods Transport Agency services qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal overturned the lower authorities' decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing a broader interpretation of the definition of input services to include outward transportation beyond the place of removal. Citing relevant case law, including a Karnataka High Court judgment, the tribunal granted the appellant relief and set aside the previous order on 19/02/2016. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333736 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Goods Transport Agency services qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal overturned the lower authorities' decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing a broader interpretation of the definition of input services to include outward transportation beyond the place of removal. Citing relevant case law, including a Karnataka High Court judgment, the tribunal granted the appellant relief and set aside the previous order on 19/02/2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333736