<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 752 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333732</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on clear float glass imported from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and UAE were rejected. The Designated Authority&#039;s decision to impose the duty was upheld by the tribunal, which found no serious procedural breaches and determined that the DA followed the proper procedures in analyzing the issues raised. The judgment was pronounced on 07/09/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 752 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333732</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on clear float glass imported from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and UAE were rejected. The Designated Authority&#039;s decision to impose the duty was upheld by the tribunal, which found no serious procedural breaches and determined that the DA followed the proper procedures in analyzing the issues raised. The judgment was pronounced on 07/09/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>