<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 748 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333728</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed against a purchasing dealer merely because the selling dealer filed nil returns or allegedly made an incorrect revised return; that issue must be examined by the selling dealer&#039;s own assessing authority, and the purchasing dealer cannot be fixed with the seller&#039;s default. The assessment was also vitiated because no meaningful personal hearing was afforded after objections were filed, as the authority did not fix a specific hearing date before confirming reversal. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after notice, objections, personal hearing, and verification from the relevant authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 748 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333728</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed against a purchasing dealer merely because the selling dealer filed nil returns or allegedly made an incorrect revised return; that issue must be examined by the selling dealer&#039;s own assessing authority, and the purchasing dealer cannot be fixed with the seller&#039;s default. The assessment was also vitiated because no meaningful personal hearing was afforded after objections were filed, as the authority did not fix a specific hearing date before confirming reversal. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication after notice, objections, personal hearing, and verification from the relevant authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>