<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal applied earlier CESTAT precedent holding that refund objections under Notification No. 41/2007-ST based on service classification, proof of tax payment on GTA services, and invoice deficiencies were untenable. Following that settled line of decisions, it found that the Revenue could not sustain rejection of the service tax refund on the same grounds. The impugned order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s refund claim was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:46:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal applied earlier CESTAT precedent holding that refund objections under Notification No. 41/2007-ST based on service classification, proof of tax payment on GTA services, and invoice deficiencies were untenable. Following that settled line of decisions, it found that the Revenue could not sustain rejection of the service tax refund on the same grounds. The impugned order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s refund claim was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>