https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187455 The appellant's absence during the hearing led to finalizing the appeal with the assistance of the Ld. DR. The demand for service tax on renting immovable property services was confirmed, with a penalty later waived under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The challenge to the invocation of the extended period of limitation was rejected, emphasizing the need to discharge tax liabilities despite ignorance of the law. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, highlighting the importance of compliance with tax obligations. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:54:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187455 The appellant's absence during the hearing led to finalizing the appeal with the assistance of the Ld. DR. The demand for service tax on renting immovable property services was confirmed, with a penalty later waived under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The challenge to the invocation of the extended period of limitation was rejected, emphasizing the need to discharge tax liabilities despite ignorance of the law. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order, highlighting the importance of compliance with tax obligations. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187455