<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1227 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187451</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order of the 2nd respondent and directed reconsideration of the appeal without requiring permission from the Cabinet Committee. The 2nd respondent was instructed to provide a hearing to the petitioner and promptly finalize the appeal. The interim stay order granted during the appeal process was to continue until conclusion. The Writ Petition was disposed of, ensuring fairness in the appeal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1227 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187451</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order of the 2nd respondent and directed reconsideration of the appeal without requiring permission from the Cabinet Committee. The 2nd respondent was instructed to provide a hearing to the petitioner and promptly finalize the appeal. The interim stay order granted during the appeal process was to continue until conclusion. The Writ Petition was disposed of, ensuring fairness in the appeal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>