<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 985 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187449</link>
    <description>In the peculiar facts of the case, the SC declined to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petitions. The Court expressly left the question of law open, so no substantive legal principle was finally determined on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 985 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187449</link>
      <description>In the peculiar facts of the case, the SC declined to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the special leave petitions. The Court expressly left the question of law open, so no substantive legal principle was finally determined on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>