https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187444 Binding precedents had already settled the questions on capital gains arising on partition of a HUF and on whether the date of award or pronouncement governs vesting in land acquisition matters, so the Delhi HC treated the reference as academic and declined to answer the proposed questions on merits. The court noted that the contentious points stood disposed of by prior Supreme Court and High Court decisions, leaving no live issue for determination. The petition was dismissed as academic, with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:51:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187444 Binding precedents had already settled the questions on capital gains arising on partition of a HUF and on whether the date of award or pronouncement governs vesting in land acquisition matters, so the Delhi HC treated the reference as academic and declined to answer the proposed questions on merits. The court noted that the contentious points stood disposed of by prior Supreme Court and High Court decisions, leaving no live issue for determination. The petition was dismissed as academic, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 20 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187444